If there were no rules, would we be corrupt? Do rules make us corrupt? After all, only when there are rules can rules be b..
Sonia Gandhi : A dirty HAND cannot usher in clean governance
‘Sonia declines to provide tax information’ was a news item that
appears in the papers on the 25th Feb. She has cited person freedom
and security risk. One is puzzled on what security risk is there if
she discloses her tax returns. Does this security risk pertain only
to Mrs Sonia and not to the others who disclose their income tax
returns? She has also cited personal freedom. Does personal freedom
is an exclusive right of Mrs Sonia. So the others who disclose
their income tax returns have no personal freedom. It looks that
Mrs Sonia Gandhi is afraid and is not comfortable in this area
because she has much to fear. It is a known fact that she has
amassed assets and wealth disproportionate to her known income.
It seems that only Mrs Sonia Gandhi has the right to privacy.
Transparency is a must for all public servants and Mrs Sonia Gandhi
is no private person. If all MPs can disclose their incomes and if
others who are requisitioned under the RTI can oblige what is the
problem with Mrs Sonia Gandhi. How can she claim to her income tax
returns are ‘private in nature’ This cannot be allowed to go
without being challenged. It seems that Mrs Sonia Gandhi is not all
that clean in this area. There have been time and again the alleged
accusations that money-looted has flowed into her kitty. If this is
to be disclaimed then it is for her to be more transparent in her
money affairs. She is a public personality and has to disclaim
these allegations through her readiness to be transparent.
One cannot have two yardsticks-one for the other politicians and
one for her. What is this exclusive right she is claiming? I do not
know how the Chief public information officer will take this
forward. It seems that Mrs Sonia Gandhi and her children are
enjoying unfettered rights-they are outside the overview of the
ordinary law.
Similarly for the CBI to turn down the plea of Dr Swamy on probing
Mrs Sonia Gandhi’s role in Bofors is also unacceptable. The claim
of the CBI director that unless new evidence was presented the case
cannot be reopened does not hold water. But new evidence will
surface only if Mrs Sonia Gandhi is probed .Evidence will not fall
from the heavens. When it has been stated by both the CBI records
and the Swedish authorities that Indian agencies had failed to
interrogate Mrs Sonia Gandhi it reveals a fraud played on the
people of India, There seem to be a cover-up. Why this sheltering
of Mrs Sonia Gandhi against even justice. She has to be exposed and
she should readily accept to be probed if she is clean.
In the disclosure of the income tax returns also Mrs Sonia should
be treated as others and compelled to disclose. There seems to be
something fishy and stinking. Escaping the disclosure directly
points at some thing Mrs Sonia has to hide. It makes her a alleged
defaulter and more doubts are created. No matter how high you are
the law is above you Mrs Sonia Gandhi. And she goes about
campaigning that the Congress is against corruption and wants clean
governance. The test of the pudding is the eating of it. It is for
Mrs Sonia Gandhi to stand this test of transparent and fight
against corruption in her own affairs when it comes to income and
probe on the Bofors issue. Otherwise these two will stick to her
permanently –who is she afraid of? She cannot demand of others what
she herself is refusing to undergo. This is exactly what I had
written of the forked tongued Congress. And what is she afraid of?
A dirty HAND cannot usher in clean governance.
# Sonia refuses to disclose IT info,
income could be between Rs 50-75 lakh
# BBC man Mark Tully warns India against
Sonia's dynasty politics
# Sonia Gandhi - 'Holy' only in Indian
media, not so abroad? : IBTL
- Dr Mrs Hilda Raja, Vadodara
Share Your View via Facebook
top trend
-
Rules Do Not Make Ram
-
Swamy hits bulls' eye: Supreme Court accepts plea against PMO
Warrior against corruption Dr. Subramanian Swamy, who is a bigger problem for the UPA government than the entire opposit..
-
Volunteers urge Anna to restart apolitical movement for Janlokpal
The voice of continuing the anti-corruption movement demanding Janlokpal is gaining more support from different quarters..
-
Kolkata High Court bans Open cow slaughter on Bakrid
Kolkata, 3rd Nov, 2011 || In a land mark judgment passed on 2nd November, 2011, by the decision bench headed by Chief Just..
-
Gujarat is on top in donation of blood, eye and body
At diamond jubilee celebration of Blind Men’s Association managed H.V.Desai Eye Hospital in Pune of Maharashtra, G..
what next
-
-
"Coal allocations since 1993 are arbitrary and illegal", Says Supreme Court
-
Palestine, 6 billion people and second hand opinions
-
Malegaon 2006 vs. Malegaon 2008 - Blast Politics
-
Who will investigate Chidambaram & Co for the Dabhol Loot?
-
Narendra Modi prepares to climb the ramparts of the Red Fort
-
The Great Jindal Swindle
-
AAP's insidious anti-Hindu agenda
-
Nagma - Sonia Gandhi's Star Soldier
-
Aam Aadmi Party : Anti-Modi stalking horse
-
What in God's name is Teesta Setalvad's agenda?
-
-
-
Time to rethink : Saffron surge and the secular debacle - Sri Sri Ravi Shankar
-
India's Wishlist for Prime Minister Narendra Modi
-
My first meeting with Narendra Modi - Sri Sri Ravi Shankar
-
Telangana - Divide and Rule?
-
Myths vs Facts about RSS
-
The Two States: Telangana and Seemandhra
-
Answering Media on Questions to Narendra Modi, but will they venture into responding these queries?
-
#AAPCon : Dilli ke log ban gaye Mamu
-
Secularism is just synonymous with Sanatan Dharm
-
Beware of the Hoax called Aam Aadmi Party
-
Comments (Leave a Reply)