Saraswati Puja is celebrated on Jan. 28, 2012. This festival glorifies the Goddess Saraswati, patron of knowled..
Bangladesh on US strategic radar - Rijul Singh Uppal

On the day of the Bharat Bandh against the petrol price hike, 31
May 2012, the news channelTimes Now broke the news
about Washington seeking a strategic military relationship with
Bangladesh, starting with the docking of the
7th Fleet of the US Navy on an island off
Chittagong. An editorial in the Bangladesh
newspaper, Daily Star (7 May 2012) on the visit
of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, noted that, “It
has for one thing, moved the level of bilateral relationship to a
higher degree and, for another, formally brought Bangladesh on the
strategic radar of the United States. Clinton’s comments covered
both the internal political situation as well as the strategic
compulsions”.
Dhaka’s surfacing on the tactical map of the United States would
surely ring bells in the capitals of several south and south east
Asian nations. Washington is clearly upping the ante in the region,
searching for a new ally in the light of current tensions in
US-Pakistan relations, and of course, China, whom it is challenging
on the dominance of the South China Sea.
US and the Indian Ocean region: It is a delicious
irony that the US, which in 1971 send the 7th Fleet
to the Bay of Bengal to intimidate India in the Bangladesh
Liberation War, should now ask Dhaka to host the same fleet as it
defends its strategic interests vis-a-vis Myanmar and
China. Bangladesh is a natural choice as it shares borders
with India and Myanmar, is a near neighbour to China, and
stands as a bridge between south and south east Asia. For the US,
Bangladesh is a maritime nation and its access to the open sea and
the Indian Ocean is a strategic asset that America wants
tocapitalise upon.
The presence of an American naval fleet in Bangladesh could see the
Bay of Bengal emerge as a conflict zone between Beijing and
Washington, the consequences of which could be deleterious to the
Indian national and security interests. As it is, the establishment
of an American military base at the Diego Garcia Islands in the
1970s bought about a paradigm shift in the Indian Ocean Region,
adding to mistrust with the then Soviet Union. Now it is emerging
as a major conflict zone with the emergence of an assertive China.
The establishment of a US navy parking dock/bay in Bangladesh that
could possibly be converted into a permanent base for US/NATO
militaries can only add to the tensions in the region.
Since the end of the Second World War, the Indian Ocean region has
been increasingly militarised. In recent decades, Beijing
established a foothold in the region with the establishment of a
surveillance base on Myanmar’s Coco Islands.
For New Delhi, this could pose two opposing and intriguing
scenarios: 1) The Indo-US strategic partnership could evolve into
an Indo-US-Bangladesh arrangement, and 2) The US-Bangladesh
military relationship could turn out to be a bipartite relationship
on the lines of the present US-Pakistan relationship. Although some
would argue that this step could lead to a tripartite partnership,
others think it unlikely in view of America’s history of strategic
military relationships.
Overall, however, the presence of an American fleet in an exclusive
docking bay would eventually pose a strategic disadvantage to India
as it would bring all Indian military installations and the famous
missile test sites on the eastern coast under direct US
surveillance. It would also undermine the Indian Navy’s current
regional maritime dominance.
Hence it is in New Delhi’s interest to ensure that Bangladesh does
not accede to the American request for naval parking facilities off
Chittagong. The Indian government and security establishment must
take energetic measures to correct the balance of influence on
Bangladesh; South Block must offer Dhaka adequate aid to meet its
legitimate developmental needs, and resolve the messy Teesta waters
issue in as fair a manner as possible, without compromising the
interests of Bengal farmers.
Conclusion: New Delhi’s abiding problem is a weak
leadership, an incoherent foreign policy, and a propensity to be
reactive in its efforts to establish itself as a regional power. In
fact, much like the ‘emerging superpower’ lemon sold to us by the
George Bush administration, it is doubtful if New Delhi has ever
been serious about India’s natural right to be the regional
hegemon.
Certainly, our pursuit of this goal has been indifferent. We have
much to learn, if only we would, from Beijing, whose inroads into
the nations of south and south east Asia are lessons to emulate. In
recent times, India’s approach towards its neighbours has been that
of a friendly but unreliable neighbour. The ignorance and
indifference shown by the Indian polity as a whole towards
countries like Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and even Iran has
created a vacuum of regional leadership.
Our foreign policy appears to rest upon ignorance of our neighbours
and their genuine needs, and unduly weak and deferential towards
western nations, especially America, even on matters concerning
regional geopolitics and our own internal security. That is why the
US secretary of state Hillary Clinton can ‘advice’ us on our
relations with Bangladesh.
It is time to shake off the ennui and sloth of the Foreign Office
and to reach our potential as a regional power. The tilt by Sri
Lanka and Bangladesh away from India is a clear failure of India’s
foreign policy mandarins.
As a beginning, we must accept the harsh truth that SAARC as a
regional organisation established to increase co-operation and
build trust between the member nations is a failure. Despite the
existence of SAARC, we have not achieved any regional co-operation
in the past decade. Instead of using SAARC to exert leadership and
handle regional issues, India has been toeing western line in the
UN on issues concerning the region. The UN resolution on War Crimes
in Sri Lanka, where India toed the western line instead of calling
a meeting of SAARC to resolve the issue within the region, is only
the latest instance of this colossal failure of Indian
diplomacy.
References: Times Now . South Asia Analysis
First Published | Rijul Singh
Uppal | Follow writer twitter.com/therijuluppal
Share Your View via Facebook
top trend
-
Basant Panchami : Saraswati Puja 2012
-
Swamy against Minority reservation, warns not to be duped by Sonia's bahu image
Jaipur : Janta Party President Dr. Subramanian Swamy addressed the gathering a Jaipur in his trademark ..
-
Agnihotra: The solution to prevent effect of nuclear radiation!
Recently we witnessed a horrific situation in Japan. The malfunctioning and subsequent explosion..
-
IBTL's divine meet with Pujaniya Sri Sri Ravishankar Ji
It was a blessed day for IBTL when we got aashirwad from His Divine Holiness Pujaniya Sri Sri Ravishankar Ji in Delhi. S..
-
Modi rocked, Gehlot shocked: NRI Conference
Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi outshined others in Pravasi Bharatiya Sammelan at Jaipur. The joint session was pa..
what next
-
-
"Coal allocations since 1993 are arbitrary and illegal", Says Supreme Court
-
Palestine, 6 billion people and second hand opinions
-
Malegaon 2006 vs. Malegaon 2008 - Blast Politics
-
Who will investigate Chidambaram & Co for the Dabhol Loot?
-
Narendra Modi prepares to climb the ramparts of the Red Fort
-
The Great Jindal Swindle
-
AAP's insidious anti-Hindu agenda
-
Nagma - Sonia Gandhi's Star Soldier
-
Aam Aadmi Party : Anti-Modi stalking horse
-
What in God's name is Teesta Setalvad's agenda?
-
-
-
Time to rethink : Saffron surge and the secular debacle - Sri Sri Ravi Shankar
-
India's Wishlist for Prime Minister Narendra Modi
-
My first meeting with Narendra Modi - Sri Sri Ravi Shankar
-
Telangana - Divide and Rule?
-
Myths vs Facts about RSS
-
The Two States: Telangana and Seemandhra
-
Answering Media on Questions to Narendra Modi, but will they venture into responding these queries?
-
#AAPCon : Dilli ke log ban gaye Mamu
-
Secularism is just synonymous with Sanatan Dharm
-
Beware of the Hoax called Aam Aadmi Party
-
Comments (Leave a Reply)